Recognizing
HS
Rheumatology
Moderate to Severe
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active
Psoriatic Arthritis
Active
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Moderate to Severe
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Non-Infectious
Intermediate, Posterior and Panuveitis
Dermatology
Moderate to Severe
Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Active
Psoriatic Arthritis
Moderate to Severe
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Refractory, Moderate to Severe
Atopic Dermatitis
Gastroenterology
Moderate to Severe
Crohn's Disease
Moderate to Severe
Pediatric Crohn's Disease
Moderate to Severe
Ulcerative Colitis
Moderate to Severe
Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis
Ophthalmology
Non-Infectious
Intermediate, Posterior and Panuveitis
US-MULT-200779
For the treatment of moderate to severe hidradenitis
suppurativa (HS) in patients 12 years of age and older
HOW TO RECOGNIZE HS
Not an actual HS patient
Looking to
treat with
HUMIRA?
Importance of Timely HS Identification
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, immune-mediated skin disease that can be progressive and debilitating.2,3
It occurs in many patients’ most sensitive areas.4 Due to the progressive nature of HS, an early, accurate diagnosis is critical before symptoms become more severe.5
Prompt identification and diagnosis is one of the most unmet needs in managing HS3
2+ YEARS
is the average delay in seeing
a physician (from symptom
onset to first visit)6
7-10 YEARS
is the average delay
in diagnosing HS7
4-5 PHYSICIANS
are typically seen before an HS
diagnosis is made6-8
When identifying HS, it is important to know who is typically affected and the challenges that may delay diagnosis. Women are more likely than men to develop HS, with a 3:1 ratio. Symptoms occur in patients' most sensitive areas and can start at any time between puberty and middle age—with the average age of onset around 21.4,9,10
There are 2 key reasons timely HS diagnosis can be challenging. First, patients may be embarrassed and wait until symptoms become severe before seeking medical attention. Secondly, early HS lesions may be mistaken for infections, STDs, or other skin conditions.11,12
Three criteria must be present to consider a diagnosis of HS13:
Typical signs and symptoms of moderate to severe HS include4,13:
Inflamed, painful lesions and nodules
Abscesses
Sinus tracts*
(non-draining or draining with malodorous discharge)
Double comedones
Bridged, hypertrophic scarring
Consider asking your patient: Have you experienced tender, raised bumps or boils?
*Photo courtesy of Dr. Marc Bourcier.
HS lesions typically appear in 1 or more of the following anatomical locations: axilla, groin, genitals, buttocks, or under the breasts. However, lesions can occur anywhere on the body.11,13,14
Consider asking your patient:
Have these bumps or boils appeared on your inner thighs or groin, under your arms or breasts, or on your buttocks?
Patients with HS often present with a history of chronic inflammation and recurrence of lesions in the same or different anatomical locations. Many HS patients will experience 2 or more recurrences over a 6-month period.13,15
Consider asking your patient:
Have these symptoms reappeared 2 or more times in the past 6 months in the same or different location?
Other Considerations
To help with diagnosing HS, also consider asking your patients13:
Have any scars formed where you experienced these bumps?
Do you have a family history of similar symptoms and/or HS?
The severity of HS may be determined by the Hurley staging system, a widely used classification.4,9
MILD/STAGE I4,9
Typically presents as abscess formation, single or multiple, without sinus tracts and scarring
Reprinted with permission from Jemec, 2012.9
MODERATE/STAGE II4,9,16
Typically presents as recurrent abscesses with sinus tract formation and scarring; single or multiple widely separated lesions
SEVERE/STAGE III4,9,16
Typically presents as diffuse or near-diffuse involvement with multiple interconnected sinus tracts and abscesses across entire area
In a US study of 268 patients, 40% had Hurley Stage II or III disease at diagnosis.14
Photo courtesy of Dr. Marc Bourcier.
The Progressive Nature of HS
As HS goes undiagnosed, the disease can progress to more severe symptoms, such as the development of sinus tracts and scarring, that may leave irreversible, disabling damage.11
Often devastating for patients, frustrating for physicians
Partner with a dermatologist experienced in HS to confirm the diagnosis as soon as you suspect HS.
I didn't want to tell my husband
or my doctor. I started hiding.
I just shut down.
– Insight from actual HS patient
Looking to prescribe HUMIRA? INDICATION(S) and IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION FOR HUMIRA (adalimumab)1
INDICATION(S)1
Plaque Psoriasis: HUMIRA is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, and when other systemic therapies are medically less appropriate. HUMIRA should only be administered to patients who will be closely monitored and have regular follow-up visits with a physician.
Psoriatic Arthritis: HUMIRA is indicated, alone or in combination with non-biologic DMARDs, for reducing signs and symptoms, inhibiting the progression of structural damage, and improving physical function in adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis.
Hidradenitis Suppurativa: HUMIRA is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa in patients 12 years of age and older.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION1
SERIOUS INFECTIONS
Patients treated with HUMIRA are at increased risk for developing serious infections that may lead to hospitalization or death. Most patients who developed these infections were taking concomitant immunosuppressants such as methotrexate or corticosteroids.
Discontinue HUMIRA if a patient develops a serious infection or sepsis.
Reported infections include:
- Active tuberculosis (TB), including reactivation of latent TB. Patients with TB have frequently presented with disseminated or extrapulmonary disease. Test patients for latent TB before HUMIRA use and during therapy. Initiate treatment for latent TB prior to HUMIRA use.
- Invasive fungal infections, including histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, candidiasis, aspergillosis, blastomycosis, and pneumocystosis. Patients with histoplasmosis or other invasive fungal infections may present with disseminated, rather than localized, disease. Antigen and antibody testing for histoplasmosis may be negative in some patients with active infection. Consider empiric anti-fungal therapy in patients at risk for invasive fungal infections who develop severe systemic illness.
- Bacterial, viral, and other infections due to opportunistic pathogens, including Legionella and Listeria.
Carefully consider the risks and benefits of treatment with HUMIRA prior to initiating therapy in patients: 1. with chronic or recurrent infection, 2. who have been exposed to TB, 3. with a history of opportunistic infection, 4. who resided in or traveled in regions where mycoses are endemic, 5. with underlying conditions that may predispose them to infection. Monitor patients closely for the development of signs and symptoms of infection during and after treatment with HUMIRA, including the possible development of TB in patients who tested negative for latent TB infection prior to initiating therapy.
- Do not start HUMIRA during an active infection, including localized infections.
- Patients older than 65 years, patients with co-morbid conditions, and/or patients taking concomitant immunosuppressants may be at greater risk of infection.
- If an infection develops, monitor carefully and initiate appropriate therapy.
- Drug interactions with biologic products: A higher rate of serious infections has been observed in RA patients treated with rituximab who received subsequent treatment with a TNF blocker. An increased risk of serious infections has been seen with the combination of TNF blockers with anakinra or abatacept, with no demonstrated added benefit in patients with RA. Concomitant administration of HUMIRA with other biologic DMARDs (e.g., anakinra or abatacept) or other TNF blockers is not recommended based on the possible increased risk for infections and other potential pharmacological interactions.
MALIGNANCY
Lymphoma and other malignancies, some fatal, have been reported in children and adolescent patients treated with TNF blockers, including HUMIRA. Postmarketing cases of hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL), a rare type of T-cell lymphoma, have been reported in patients treated with TNF blockers, including HUMIRA. These cases have had a very aggressive disease course and have been fatal. The majority of reported TNF blocker cases have occurred in patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis and the majority were in adolescent and young adult males. Almost all of these patients had received treatment with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine concomitantly with a TNF blocker at or prior to diagnosis. It is uncertain whether the occurrence of HSTCL is related to use of a TNF blocker or a TNF blocker in combination with these other immunosuppressants.
- Consider the risks and benefits of HUMIRA treatment prior to initiating or continuing therapy in a patient with known malignancy.
- In clinical trials, more cases of malignancies were observed among HUMIRA-treated patients compared to control patients.
- Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) was reported during clinical trials for HUMIRA-treated patients. Examine all patients, particularly those with a history of prolonged immunosuppressant or PUVA therapy, for the presence of NMSC prior to and during treatment with HUMIRA.
- In HUMIRA clinical trials, there was an approximate 3-fold higher rate of lymphoma than expected in the general U.S. population. Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases, particularly those with highly active disease and/or chronic exposure to immunosuppressant therapies, may be at higher risk of lymphoma than the general population, even in the absence of TNF blockers.
- Postmarketing cases of acute and chronic leukemia were reported with TNF blocker use. Approximately half of the postmarketing cases of malignancies in children, adolescents, and young adults receiving TNF blockers were lymphomas; other cases included rare malignancies associated with immunosuppression and malignancies not usually observed in children and adolescents.
HYPERSENSITIVITY
- Anaphylaxis and angioneurotic edema have been reported following HUMIRA administration. If a serious allergic reaction occurs, stop HUMIRA and institute appropriate therapy.
HEPATITIS B VIRUS REACTIVATION
- Use of TNF blockers, including HUMIRA, may increase the risk of reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients who are chronic carriers. Some cases have been fatal.
- Evaluate patients at risk for HBV infection for prior evidence of HBV infection before initiating TNF blocker therapy.
- Exercise caution in patients who are carriers of HBV and monitor them during and after HUMIRA treatment.
- Discontinue HUMIRA and begin antiviral therapy in patients who develop HBV reactivation. Exercise caution when resuming HUMIRA after HBV treatment.
NEUROLOGIC REACTIONS
- TNF blockers, including HUMIRA, have been associated with rare cases of new onset or exacerbation of central nervous system and peripheral demyelinating diseases, including multiple sclerosis, optic neuritis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome.
- Exercise caution when considering HUMIRA for patients with these disorders; discontinuation of HUMIRA should be considered if any of these disorders develop.
- There is a known association between intermediate uveitis and central demyelinating disorders.
HEMATOLOGIC REACTIONS
- Rare reports of pancytopenia, including aplastic anemia, have been reported with TNF blockers. Medically significant cytopenia has been infrequently reported with HUMIRA.
- Consider stopping HUMIRA if significant hematologic abnormalities occur.
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
- Worsening and new onset congestive heart failure (CHF) has been reported with TNF blockers. Cases of worsening CHF have been observed with HUMIRA; exercise caution and monitor carefully.
AUTOIMMUNITY
- Treatment with HUMIRA may result in the formation of autoantibodies and, rarely, in development of a lupus-like syndrome. Discontinue treatment if symptoms of a lupus-like syndrome develop.
IMMUNIZATIONS
- Patients on HUMIRA should not receive live vaccines.
- Pediatric patients, if possible, should be brought up to date with all immunizations before initiating HUMIRA therapy.
- Adalimumab is actively transferred across the placenta during the third trimester of pregnancy and may affect immune response in the in utero exposed infant. The safety of administering live or live-attenuated vaccines in infants exposed to HUMIRA in utero is unknown. Risks and benefits should be considered prior to vaccinating (live or live-attenuated) exposed infants.
ADVERSE REACTIONS
- The most common adverse reactions in HUMIRA clinical trials (>10%) were: infections (e.g., upper respiratory, sinusitis), injection site reactions, headache, and rash.
INDICATIONS1
Rheumatoid Arthritis: HUMIRA is indicated, alone or in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs, for reducing signs and symptoms, inducing major clinical response, inhibiting the progression of structural damage, and improving physical function in adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis.
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: HUMIRA is indicated, alone or in combination with methotrexate, for reducing signs and symptoms of moderately to severely active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis in patients 2 years of age and older.
Psoriatic Arthritis: HUMIRA is indicated, alone or in combination with non-biologic DMARDs, for reducing signs and symptoms, inhibiting the progression of structural damage, and improving physical function in adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis.
Ankylosing Spondylitis: HUMIRA is indicated for reducing signs and symptoms in adult patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.
Crohn’s Disease: HUMIRA is indicated for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease in adults and pediatric patients 6 years of age and older.
Ulcerative Colitis: HUMIRA is indicated for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in adults and pediatric patients 5 years of age and older.
Limitations of Use:
The effectiveness of HUMIRA has not been established in patients who have lost response to or were intolerant to TNF blockers.Plaque Psoriasis: HUMIRA is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, and when other systemic therapies are medically less appropriate. HUMIRA should only be administered to patients who will be closely monitored and have regular follow-up visits with a physician.
Hidradenitis Suppurativa: HUMIRA is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa in patients 12 years of age and older.
Uveitis: HUMIRA is indicated for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis in adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older.
Please see Full Prescribing Information.
US-HUM-210183
References: 1. HUMIRA Injection [package insert]. North Chicago, IL: AbbVie Inc. 2. Nazary M, van der Zee HH, Prens EP, Folkerts G, Boer J. Pathogenesis and pharmacotherapy of hidradenitis suppurativa. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;672(1-3):1-8. 3. Kerdel FA, Menter A, Micheletti RG. Introduction. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2014;33(suppl 3):S47. 4. Alikhan A, Lynch PJ, Eisen DB. Hidradenitis suppurativa: a comprehensive review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(4):539-561. 5. Woodruff CM, Charlie AM, Leslie KS. Hidradenitis suppurativa: a guide for the practicing physician. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(12):1679-1693. 6. Saunte DM, Boer J, Stratigos A, et al. Diagnostic delay in hidradenitis suppurativa is a global problem. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173(6):1546-1549. 7. Garg A, Neuren E, Cha D, et al. Evaluating patients' unmet needs in hidradenitis suppurativa: results from the Global Survey Of Impact and Healthcare Needs (VOICE) Project. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(2):366-376. 8. Alavi A, Lynde C, Alhusayen R, et al. Approach to the management of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a consensus document. J Cutan Med Surg. 2017;21(6):513-524. 9. Jemec GBE Clinical practice. Hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(2):158-164. 10. Collier F, Smith RC, Morton CA. Diagnosis and management of hidradenitis suppurativa. BMJ. 2013;346:f2121. 11. Micheletti RG. Natural history, presentation, and diagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2014;33(suppl 3):S51-S53. 12. Kimball AB, Jemec GBE, eds. Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Disease Primer. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2017. 13. van der Zee HH, Jemec GBE. New insights into diagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa: clinical presentations and phenotypes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(5)(suppl 1):S23-S26. 14. Vazquez BG, Alikhan A, Weaver AL, Wetter DA, Davis MD. Incidence of hidradenitis suppurativa and associated factors: a population-based study of Olmsted County, Minnesota. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(1):97-103. 15. Vinding GR, Miller IM, Zarchi K, Ibler KS, Ellervik C, Jemec GBE. The prevalence of inverse recurrent suppuration: a population-based study of possible hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(4):884-889. 16. Data on file, ABVRRTI68916.
REVEAL was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 1212 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and ≥10% BSA involvement, PASI score ≥12, and PGA of at least moderate disease severity. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of psoriasis for at least 6 months and stable disease for at least 2 months before screening. Evaluations were performed over 3 treatment periods totaling 52 weeks. For the first 16 weeks (Period A), patients received either HUMIRA (n=814), at an initial dose of 80 mg SC at week 0 followed by 40 mg EOW SC starting at week 1, or placebo (n=398).
In Period B, patients who achieved at least a PASI 75 response at week 16 received open-label HUMIRA 40 mg EOW for 17 weeks. In Period C, patients who maintained at least a PASI 75 response at week 33 and were originally randomized to HUMIRA in Period A were re-randomized to receive HUMIRA 40 mg EOW or placebo for an additional 19 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoints at week 16 were proportion of patients achieving a PASI 75 response relative to baseline and proportion of patients achieving a PGA score of clear or minimal disease.
US-HUMD-210070
EOW=every other week
a315 patients were initially randomized; however, 2 patients did not receive study drug.12
- A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of HUMIRA in adult patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (≥3 swollen joints and ≥3 tender joints) who had an inadequate response to NSAIDs.11,12
- Patients must have active psoriatic skin lesions or a documented history of psoriasis.12
- Co-primary endpoints were American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 12 and mean change from baseline in modified total Sharp score (mTSS) for HUMIRA-treated patients at week 48 vs placebo patients at week 24.1,12
- Select secondary endpoints include ACR20 at week 24, ACR50/70 at weeks 12 and 24, and HAQ-DI score at week 12 and 24.12
- After week 12, patients who failed to have at least a 20% decrease in both swollen and tender joint counts on 2 consecutive visits could receive rescue therapy with corticosteroids or DMARDs.12
- Patients who completed the original 24-week, double-blind ADEPT study (n=289) were eligible for open-label treatment through week 144, for which over 98% (n=285) elected to enroll.7,11
US-HUMD-210070
PIONEER I and II STUDY DESIGNS1,3,13,15
The first and only completed Phase 3 trials in HS
- Enrolled patients had a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of ≥3 with lesions in ≥2 anatomic areas, one of which was Hurley Stage II or III.
- Primary efficacy endpoint was Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 12.
- Period B explored the safety and efficacy of different maintenance regimens (continuous HUMIRA EW, reduction to HUMIRA EOW, or treatment withdrawal) over 24 weeks.
aStratified by baseline Hurley Stage II vs III (PIONEER I & II) and baseline concomitant antibiotic use (PIONEER II).
b160 mg week 0; 80 mg week 2; 40 mg from week 4.
cRe-randomization at entry to Period B, stratified by week 12 HiSCR status and baseline Hurley Stage II vs III.
d160 mg week 12; 80 mg week 14; 40 mg weekly from week 16.
*Weeks of efficacy and patient-reported outcomes analysis.
†Loss of response=defined as a loss of ≥50% in improvement in AN count achieved from baseline to week 12.
‡Worsening or absence of improvement=an AN count ≥ the baseline AN count at 2 consecutive visits (excluding week 12) occurring at least 14 days apart.
US-HUMD-210070
REVEAL was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 1212 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and ≥10% BSA involvement, PASI score ≥12, and PGA of at least moderate disease severity. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of psoriasis for at least 6 months and stable disease for at least 2 months before screening. Evaluations were performed over 3 treatment periods totaling 52 weeks. For the first 16 weeks (Period A), patients received either HUMIRA (n=814), at an initial dose of 80 mg SC at week 0 followed by 40 mg EOW SC starting at week 1, or placebo (n=398).
In Period B, patients who achieved at least a PASI 75 response at week 16 received open-label HUMIRA 40 mg EOW for 17 weeks. In Period C, patients who maintained at least a PASI 75 response at week 33 and were originally randomized to HUMIRA in Period A were re-randomized to receive HUMIRA 40 mg EOW or placebo for an additional 19 weeks. Co-primary efficacy endpoints at week 16 were proportion of patients achieving a PASI 75 response relative to baseline and proportion of patients achieving a PGA score of clear or minimal disease.
Eligible adult patients had moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (defined as ≥10% BSA and PASI ≥10).
- Patients were to have plaque psoriasis for at least 1 year and stable plaque psoriasis for at least 2 months
- Patients were candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy
- All patients were naïve to anti-TNF therapy and MTX
- Concomitant psoriasis therapies were not permitted during the study, with the exception of shampoos free of corticosteroids, bland emollients, and low-potency topical corticosteroids for the palms, soles, face, inframammary areas, and groin only, provided they were not used within 24 hours of a study visit
aPatients were randomized to receive HUMIRA (80 mg followed by 40 mg EOW beginning 1 week later) or placebo in a 2:1 ratio.
Co-primary efficacy endpoints were proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 relative to baseline and proportion of patients achieving a PGA of clear or minimal by week 16.
US-HUMD-200130
REVEAL was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 1212 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and ≥10% BSA involvement, PASI score ≥12, and PGA of at least moderate disease severity. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of psoriasis for at least 6 months and stable disease for at least 2 months before screening. Evaluations were performed over 3 treatment periods totaling 52 weeks. For the first 16 weeks (Period A), patients received either HUMIRA (n=814), at an initial dose of 80 mg SC at week 0 followed by 40 mg EOW SC starting at week 1, or placebo (n=398).8,9
In Period B, patients who achieved at least a PASI 75 response at week 16 received open-label HUMIRA 40 mg EOW for 17 weeks. In Period C, patients who maintained at least a PASI 75 response at week 33 and were originally randomized to HUMIRA in Period A were re-randomized to receive HUMIRA 40 mg EOW or placebo for an additional 19 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoints at week 16 were proportion of patients achieving a PASI 75 response relative to baseline and proportion of patients achieving a PGA score of clear or minimal disease.
US-HUMD-190337
EOW=every other week
a315 patients were initially randomized; however, 2 patients did not receive study drug.11
- A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of HUMIRA in adult patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (≥3 swollen joints and ≥3 tender joints) who had an inadequate response to NSAIDs.10,11
- Patients must have active psoriatic skin lesions or a documented history of psoriasis.11
- Co-primary endpoints were American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 12 and mean change from baseline in modified total Sharp score (mTSS) for HUMIRA-treated patients at week 48 vs placebo patients at week 24.1,11
- Select secondary endpoints include ACR20 at week 24, ACR50/70 at weeks 12 and 24, and HAQ-DI at week 12 and 24.11
- After week 12, patients who failed to have at least a 20% decrease in both swollen and tender joint counts on 2 consecutive visits could receive rescue therapy with corticosteroids or DMARDs.11
- Patients who completed the original 24-week, double-blind ADEPT study (n=289) were eligible for open-label treatment through week 144, for which over 98% (n=285) elected to enroll.6,10
US-HUMD-190337
ADEPT STUDY DESIGN1-3,5
EOW=every other week
a315 patients were initially randomized; however, 2 patients did not receive study drug.3
- A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of HUMIRA in adult patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (≥3 swollen joints and ≥3 tender joints) who had an inadequate response to NSAIDs.2,3
- Patients must have active psoriatic skin lesions or a documented history of psoriasis.3
- Co-primary endpoints were American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 12 and mean change from baseline in modified total Sharp score (mTSS) for HUMIRA-treated patients at week 48 vs placebo patients at week 24.1,3
- Select secondary endpoints include ACR20 at week 24, ACR50/70 at weeks 12 and 24, and HAQ-DI score at week 12 and 24.3
- After week 12, patients who failed to have at least a 20% decrease in both swollen and tender joint counts on 2 consecutive visits could receive rescue therapy with corticosteroids or DMARDs.3
- Select additional endpoints include: ACR components at week 2 and pain data at weeks 2 and 24.1,6
- Patients who completed the original 24-week, double-blind ADEPT study (n=289) were eligible for open-label treatment through week 144, for which over 98% (n=285) elected to enroll.2,5
US-HUMD-200130
PIONEER I and II STUDY DESIGNS1,12,14,15
The first and only completed Phase 3 trials in HS
- Enrolled patients had a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of ≥3 with lesions in ≥2 anatomic areas, one of which was Hurley Stage II or III.
- Primary efficacy endpoint was Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 12.
- Period B explored the safety and efficacy of different maintenance regimens (continuous HUMIRA EW, reduction to HUMIRA EOW, or treatment withdrawal) over 24 weeks.
PIONEER I control=placebo PIONEER II control=placebo +/- antibiotic
aStratified by baseline Hurley Stage II vs III (PIONEER I & II) and baseline concomitant antibiotic use (PIONEER II).
b160 mg week 0; 80 mg week 2; 40 mg from week 4.
cRe-randomization at entry to Period B, stratified by week 12 HiSCR status and baseline Hurley Stage II vs III.
d160 mg week 12; 80 mg week 14; 40 mg weekly from week 16.
*Weeks of efficacy and patient-reported outcomes analysis.
†Loss of response=defined as a loss of ≥50% in improvement in AN count achieved from baseline to week 12.
‡Worsening or absence of improvement=an AN count ≥ the baseline AN count at 2 consecutive visits (excluding week 12) occurring at least 14 days apart.
US-HUMD-190337
HUMIRA demonstrated significant improvements from baseline in ACR components of disease activity (P<0.001)1
| HUMIRAa 40 mg EOW (n=151) | Placebo EOW (n=162) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter: median | Baseline | 24 Weeks | Baseline | 24 Weeks |
| Tender joint countb | 20.0 | 5.0 | 23.0 | 17.0 |
| Swollen joint countc | 11.0 | 3.0 | 11.0 | 9.0 |
| Physician global assessmentd | 55.0 | 16.0 | 53.0 | 49.0 |
| Patient global assessmentd | 48.0 | 20.0 | 49.5 | 49.0 |
| Paind | 54.0 | 20.0 | 49.0 | 49.0 |
| Disability index (HAQ)e | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| CRP (mg/dL)f | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
aP<0.001 for HUMIRA vs placebo; comparisons based on mean changes.
bScale 0-78.
cScale 0-76.
dVisual analog scale; 0=best, 100=worst.
eDisability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI); 0=best, 3=worst; measures the patient’s ability to perform the following: dress/groom, arise, eat, walk, reach, grip, maintain hygiene, and maintain daily activity.
fNormal range: 0-0.287 mg/dL.
US-HUMD-200130
HUMIRA demonstrated significant improvements from baseline in every ACR component (P<0.001)1
| HUMIRA 40 mg EOW (n=151) | Placebo EOW (n=162) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter: median | Baseline | 24 Weeks | Baseline | 24 Weeks |
| Number of tender joints | 20.0 | 5.0 | 23.0 | 17.0 |
| Number of swollen joints | 11.0 | 3.0 | 11.0 | 9.0 |
| Physician global assessment | 55.0 | 16.0 | 53.0 | 49.0 |
| Patient global assessment | 48.0 | 20.0 | 49.5 | 49.0 |
| Pain | 54.0 | 20.0 | 49.0 | 49.0 |
| Disability index (HAQ) | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
aP<0.001 for HUMIRA vs placebo; comparisons based on mean changes.
bScale 0-78.
cScale 0-76.
dVisual analog scale; 0=best, 100=worst.
eDisability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI); 0=best, 3=worst; measures the patient’s ability to perform the following: dress/groom, arise, eat, walk, reach, grip, maintain hygiene, and maintain daily activity.
fNormal range: 0-0.287 mg/dL.
US-HUMD-200130
PIONEER I and II STUDY DESIGNS—88 PATIENTS STUDIED IN OLE1-4
88 patients who were studied in OLE received continuous HUMIRA weekly throughout the trial period (periods A and B) and throughout the OLE.
- Enrolled patients had a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of ≥3 with lesions in ≥2 anatomic areas, one of which was Hurley Stage II or III.
- Primary efficacy endpoint was Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 12.
- Period B explored the safety and efficacy of different maintenance regimens (continuous HUMIRA EW, reduction to HUMIRA EOW, or treatment withdrawal) over 24 weeks.
PIONEER I control=placebo PIONEER II control=placebo +/- antibiotic
aStratified by baseline Hurley Stage II vs III (PIONEER I & II) and baseline concomitant antibiotic use (PIONEER II).
b160 mg week 0; 80 mg week 2; 40 mg from week 4.
cRe-randomization at entry to Period B, stratified by week 12 HiSCR status and baseline Hurley Stage II vs III.
d160 mg week 12; 80 mg week 14; 40 mg weekly from week 16.
*Weeks of efficacy and patient-reported outcomes analysis.
†Loss of response=defined as a loss of ≥50% in improvement in AN count achieved from baseline to week 12.
‡Worsening or absence of improvement=an AN count ≥ the baseline AN count at 2 consecutive visits (excluding week 12) occurring at least 14 days apart.
US-HUMD-200052
ADEPT STUDY DESIGN1-4
EOW=every other week
a315 patients were initially randomized; however, 2 patients did not receive study drug.2
- A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of HUMIRA in adult patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (≥3 swollen joints and ≥3 tender joints) who had an inadequate response to NSAIDs.2,4
- Patients must have active psoriatic skin lesions or a documented history of psoriasis.2
- Co-primary endpoints were American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 12 and mean change from baseline in modified total Sharp score (mTSS) for HUMIRA-treated patients at week 48 vs placebo patients at week 24.1,2
- Select secondary endpoints include ACR20 at week 24, ACR 50/70 at weeks 12 and 24, and HAQ-DI score at week 12 and 24.2
- After week 12, patients who failed to have at least a 20% decrease in both swollen and tender joint counts on 2 consecutive visits could receive rescue therapy with corticosteroids or DMARDs.2
- Patients who completed the original 24-week, double-blind ADEPT study (n=289) were eligible for open-label treatment through week 144, for which over 98% (n=285) elected to enroll.3,4
US-HUMD-200257
PIONEER I and II STUDY DESIGNS1,3-5
- Enrolled patients had a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of ≥3 with lesions in ≥2 anatomic areas, one of which was Hurley Stage II or III.
- Primary efficacy endpoint was Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 12.
- Period B explored the safety and efficacy of different maintenance regimens (continuous HUMIRA EW, reduction to HUMIRA EOW, or treatment withdrawal) over 24 weeks.
PIONEER I control=placebo PIONEER II control=placebo +/- antibiotic
aStratified by baseline Hurley Stage II vs III (PIONEER I & II) and baseline concomitant antibiotic use (PIONEER II).
b160 mg week 0; 80 mg week 2; 40 mg from week 4.
cRe-randomization at entry to Period B, stratified by week 12 HiSCR status and baseline Hurley Stage II vs III.
d160 mg week 12; 80 mg week 14; 40 mg weekly from week 16.
*Weeks of efficacy and patient-reported outcomes analysis.
†Loss of response=defined as a loss of ≥ 50% in improvement in AN count achieved from baseline to week 12.
‡Worsening or absence of improvement=an AN count ≥ the baseline AN count at 2 consecutive visits (excluding week 12) occurring at least 14 days apart.
SELECT BASELINE PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS3,6
PIONEER I |
PIONEER II |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMIRA EW(n=153) g |
Controle (n=154)g |
HUMIRA EW (n=163)g |
Controlf (n=163)g |
||
Gender, n (%) |
Female Male |
91 (59.5) 62 (40.5) |
105 (68.2) 49 (31.8) |
108 (66.3) 55 (33.7) |
113 (69.3) 50 (30.7) |
Race,h n (%) |
White Black Otheri |
116 (75.8) 33 (21.6) 4 (2.6) |
118 (76.6) 29 (18.8) 7 (4.5) |
143 (87.7) 9 (5.5) 11 (6.7) |
130 (79.8) 20 (12.3) 13 (8.0) |
Age in years: |
36.2 (10.8) |
37.8 (11.3) |
34.9 (10.0) |
36.1 (12.2) |
|
Body weight in kg: |
Female Male |
(n=91)92.3 (23.2) (n=62)104.1 (25.8) |
(n=105)97.5 (23.1) (n=49)103.1 (28.8) |
(n=108)87.3 (21.8) (n=55)95.9 (20.7) |
(n=113)90.9 (23.2) (n=50)106.5 (28.4) |
Body mass index in |
(n=152)33.0 (7.6) |
(n=154)34.5 (7.9) |
(n=163)31.3 (7.4) |
(n=161)32.9 (7.9) |
|
SELECT BASELINE DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS3,6,7
PIONEER I |
PIONEER II |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMIRA EW(n=153) g |
Controle (n=154)g |
HUMIRA EW (n=163)g |
Controlf (n=163)g |
||
Hurley Stage,j n (%) |
II III |
80 (52.3) 73 (47.7) |
81 (52.6) 73 (47.4) |
86 (52.8) 77 (47.2) |
89 (54.6) 74 (45.4) |
Previous systemic |
Any |
71 (46.4) |
63 (40.1) |
82 (50.3) |
76 (46.6) |
Disease duration in |
8.8 (1.1, 40.4) |
9.4 (1.0, 43.0) |
9.0 (1.0, 43.5) |
9.9 (1.2, 68.5) |
|
Family history of HSk |
39 (25.5) |
32 (20.8) |
39 (24.1) |
43 (26.4) |
|
hs-CRP in mg/L: |
(n=152)20.3 (25) |
(n=151)17.4 (20.2) |
13.3 (18.0) |
18.3 (30.7) |
|
SELECT BASELINE LESION TYPE3,6,7
PIONEER I |
PIONEER II |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMIRA EW(n=153) g |
Controle (n=154)g |
HUMIRA EW (n=163)g |
Controlf (n=163)g |
||
Abscess and |
≤5 6-10 ≥11 |
24 (15.7) 54 (35.3) 75 (49.0) |
36 (23.4) 33 (21.4) 85 (55.2) |
47 (28.8) 61 (37.4) 55 (33.7) |
50 (30.7) 51 (31.3) 62 (38.0) |
Abscess and |
14.3 (11.9) |
14.4 (14.8) |
10.7 (8.1) |
11.9 (11.0) |
|
Abscesses, mean (SD) |
2.8 (3.5) |
2.7 (3.7) |
2.0 (2.6) |
2.4 (3.3) |
|
Inflammatory nodules, |
11.5 (10.9) |
11.6 (13.9) |
8.6 (6.9) |
9.4 (9.6) |
|
Draining fistulas, |
4.6 (5.2) |
3.8 (4.4) |
3.0 (4.1) |
3.7 (5.2) |
|
Baseline characteristics identified as different between PIONEER I and PIONEER II are3:
- baseline weight
- baseline lesion count
These differences in baseline characteristics may in part account for the observed differences in magnitude between the 2 studies.
eControl=placebo.
fControl=placebo ± antibiotic.
gNumber of patients unless otherwise indicated EW.
hRace was self-reported.
iln PIONEER I, the “other” category included Asian (4 patients, 1.3%), American Indian or Alaskan native (2 patients, 0.7%), multiple races (1 patient, 0.3%), and other (4 patients,1.3%). In PIONEER II, the “other” category included Asian (10 patients, 3.1%), American Indian or Alaskan native (1 patient, 0.3%), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (1 patient, 0.3%), multiple races (3 patients, 0.9%), and other (9 patients, 2.8%).
jData reflect actual assessments, not the Hurley Stage stratification factor. A patient's overall Hurley Stage was documented as the highest stage across all affected anatomical regions. Stage I is defined as localized formation of single or multiple abscesses, without sinus tracts or scarring; Stage II as recurrent abscesses (single or multiple), with sinus tract formation and scarring; and Stage Ill as multiple abscesses, with extensive, interconnected sinus tracts and scarring.
kData missing for PIONEER II, HUMIRA EW (n=1).
lHigher values indicate a higher level of systemic inflammation.
US-HUMD-210070
PIONEER I and II STUDY DESIGNS1,3,5,6
- Enrolled patients had a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of ≥3 with lesions in ≥2 anatomic areas, one of which was Hurley Stage II or III.
- Primary efficacy endpoint was Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 12.
- Period B explored the safety and efficacy of different maintenance regimens (continuous HUMIRA EW, reduction to HUMIRA EOW, or treatment withdrawal) over 24 weeks.
PIONEER I control=placebo PIONEER II control=placebo +/- antibiotic
aStratified by baseline Hurley Stage II vs III (PIONEER I & II) and baseline concomitant antibiotic use (PIONEER II).
b160 mg week 0; 80 mg week 2; 40 mg from week 4.
cRe-randomization at entry to Period B, stratified by week 12 HiSCR status and baseline Hurley Stage II vs III.
d160 mg week 12; 80 mg week 14; 40 mg weekly from week 16.
*Weeks of efficacy and patient-reported outcomes analysis.
†Loss of response=defined as a loss of ≥50% in improvement in AN count achieved from baseline to week 12.
‡Worsening or absence of improvement=an AN count ≥ the baseline AN count at 2 consecutive visits (excluding week 12) occurring at least 14 days apart.
SELECT BASELINE PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS3,4
PIONEER I |
PIONEER II |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMIRA EW(n=153) g |
Controle (n=154)g |
HUMIRA EW (n=163)g |
Controlf (n=163)g |
||
Gender, n (%) |
Female Male |
91 (59.5) 62 (40.5) |
105 (68.2) 49 (31.8) |
108 (66.3) 55 (33.7) |
113 (69.3) 50 (30.7) |
Race,h n (%) |
White Black Otheri |
116 (75.8) 33 (21.6) 4 (2.6) |
118 (76.6) 29 (18.8) 7 (4.5) |
143 (87.7) 9 (5.5) 11 (6.7) |
130 (79.8) 20 (12.3) 13 (8.0) |
Age in years: |
36.2 (10.8) |
37.8 (11.3) |
34.9 (10.0) |
36.1 (12.2) |
|
Body weight in kg: |
Female Male |
(n=91)92.3 (23.2) (n=62)104.1 (25.8) |
(n=105)97.5 (23.1) (n=49)103.1 (28.8) |
(n=108)87.3 (21.8) (n=55)95.9 (20.7) |
(n=113)90.9 (23.2) (n=50)106.5 (28.4) |
Body mass index in |
(n=152)33.0 (7.6) |
(n=154)34.5 (7.9) |
(n=163)31.3 (7.4) |
(n=161)32.9 (7.9) |
|
SELECT BASELINE DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS3,4,7
PIONEER I |
PIONEER II |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMIRA EW(n=153) g |
Controle (n=154)g |
HUMIRA EW (n=163)g |
Controlf (n=163)g |
||
Hurley Stage,j n (%) |
II III |
80 (52.3) 73 (47.7) |
81 (52.6) 73 (47.4) |
86 (52.8) 77 (47.2) |
89 (54.6) 74 (45.4) |
Previous systemic |
Any |
71 (46.4) |
63 (40.1) |
82 (50.3) |
76 (46.6) |
Disease duration in |
8.8 (1.1, 40.4) |
9.4 (1.0, 43.0) |
9.0 (1.0, 43.5) |
9.9 (1.2, 68.5) |
|
Family history of HSk |
39 (25.5) |
32 (20.8) |
39 (24.1) |
43 (26.4) |
|
hs-CRP in mg/L: |
(n=152)20.3 (25) |
(n=151)17.4 (20.2) |
13.3 (18.0) |
18.3 (30.7) |
|
SELECT BASELINE LESION TYPE3,4,7
PIONEER I |
PIONEER II |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMIRA EW(n=153) g |
Controle (n=154)g |
HUMIRA EW (n=163)g |
Controlf (n=163)g |
||
Abscess and |
≤5 6-10 ≥11 |
24 (15.7) 54 (35.3) 75 (49.0) |
36 (23.4) 33 (21.4) 85 (55.2) |
47 (28.8) 61 (37.4) 55 (33.7) |
50 (30.7) 51 (31.3) 62 (38.0) |
Abscess and |
14.3 (11.9) |
14.4 (14.8) |
10.7 (8.1) |
11.9 (11.0) |
|
Abscesses, mean (SD) |
2.8 (3.5) |
2.7 (3.7) |
2.0 (2.6) |
2.4 (3.3) |
|
Inflammatory nodules, |
11.5 (10.9) |
11.6 (13.9) |
8.6 (6.9) |
9.4 (9.6) |
|
Draining fistulas, |
4.6 (5.2) |
3.8 (4.4) |
3.0 (4.1) |
3.7 (5.2) |
|
Baseline characteristics identified as different between PIONEER I and PIONEER II are3:
- Baseline weight
- Baseline lesion count
These differences in baseline characteristics may in part account for the observed differences in magnitude between the 2 studies.
eControl=placebo.
fControl=placebo ± antibiotic.
gNumber of patients unless otherwise indicated EW.
hRace was self-reported.
iln PIONEER I, the “other” category included Asian (4 patients, 1.3%), American Indian or Alaskan native (2 patients, 0.7%), multiple races (1 patient, 0.3%), and other (4 patients,1.3%). In PIONEER II, the “other” category included Asian (10 patients, 3.1%), American Indian or Alaskan native (1 patient, 0.3%), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (1 patient, 0.3%), multiple races (3 patients, 0.9%), and other (9 patients, 2.8%).
jData reflect actual assessments, not the Hurley Stage stratification factor. A patient's overall Hurley Stage was documented as the highest stage across all affected anatomical regions. Stage I is defined as localized formation of single or multiple abscesses, without sinus tracts or scarring; Stage II as recurrent abscesses (single or multiple), with sinus tract formation and scarring; and Stage Ill as multiple abscesses, with extensive, interconnected sinus tracts and scarring.
kData missing for PIONEER II, HUMIRA EW (n=1).
lHigher values indicate a higher level of systemic inflammation.
US-HUMD-210070
PIONEER I and II STUDY DESIGNS 1,3,13,15
The first and only completed Phase 3 trials in HS.
- Enrolled patients had a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of ≥3 with lesions in ≥2 anatomic areas, one of which was Hurley Stage II or III.
- Primary efficacy endpoint was Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 12.
- Period B explored the safety and efficacy of different maintenance regimens (continuous HUMIRA EW, reduction to HUMIRA EOW, or treatment withdrawal) over 24 weeks.
SELECT BASELINE PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS13,17
PIONEER I |
PIONEER II |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMIRA EW(n=153) g |
Controle (n=154)g |
HUMIRA EW (n=163)g |
Controlf (n=163)g |
||
Gender, n (%) |
Female Male |
91 (59.5) 62 (40.5) |
105 (68.2) 49 (31.8) |
108 (66.3) 55 (33.7) |
113 (69.3) 50 (30.7) |
Race,h n (%) |
White Black Otheri |
116 (75.8) 33 (21.6) 4 (2.6) |
118 (76.6) 29 (18.8) 7 (4.5) |
143 (87.7) 9 (5.5) 11 (6.7) |
130 (79.8) 20 (12.3) 13 (8.0) |
Age in years: |
36.2 (10.8) |
37.8 (11.3) |
34.9 (10.0) |
36.1 (12.2) |
|
Body weight in kg: |
Female Male |
(n=91)92.3 (23.2) (n=62)104.1 (25.8) |
(n=105)97.5 (23.1) (n=49)103.1 (28.8) |
(n=108)87.3 (21.8) (n=55)95.9 (20.7) |
(n=113)90.9 (23.2) (n=50)106.5 (28.4) |
Body mass index in |
(n=152)33.0 (7.6) |
(n=154)34.5 (7.9) |
(n=163)31.3 (7.4) |
(n=161)32.9 (7.9) |
|
SELECT BASELINE DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS13,17,18
PIONEER I |
PIONEER II |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMIRA EW(n=153) g |
Controle (n=154)g |
HUMIRA EW (n=163)g |
Controlf (n=163)g |
||
Hurley Stage,j n (%) |
II III |
80 (52.3) 73 (47.7) |
81 (52.6) 73 (47.4) |
86 (52.8) 77 (47.2) |
89 (54.6) 74 (45.4) |
Previous systemic |
Any |
71 (46.4) |
63 (40.1) |
82 (50.3) |
76 (46.6) |
Disease duration in |
8.8 (1.1, 40.4) |
9.4 (1.0, 43.0) |
9.0 (1.0, 43.5) |
9.9 (1.2, 68.5) |
|
Family history of HSk |
39 (25.5) |
32 (20.8) |
39 (24.1) |
43 (26.4) |
|
hs-CRP in mg/L: |
(n=152)20.3 (25) |
(n=151)17.4 (20.2) |
13.3 (18.0) |
18.3 (30.7) |
|
SELECT BASELINE LESION TYPE13,17,18
PIONEER I |
PIONEER II |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMIRA EW(n=153) g |
Controle (n=154)g |
HUMIRA EW (n=163)g |
Controlf (n=163)g |
||
Abscess and |
≤5 6-10 ≥11 |
24 (15.7) 54 (35.3) 75 (49.0) |
36 (23.4) 33 (21.4) 85 (55.2) |
47 (28.8) 61 (37.4) 55 (33.7) |
50 (30.7) 51 (31.3) 62 (38.0) |
Abscess and |
14.3 (11.9) |
14.4 (14.8) |
10.7 (8.1) |
11.9 (11.0) |
|
Abscesses, mean (SD) |
2.8 (3.5) |
2.7 (3.7) |
2.0 (2.6) |
2.4 (3.3) |
|
Inflammatory nodules, |
11.5 (10.9) |
11.6 (13.9) |
8.6 (6.9) |
9.4 (9.6) |
|
Draining fistulas, |
4.6 (5.2) |
3.8 (4.4) |
3.0 (4.1) |
3.7 (5.2) |
|
Baseline characteristics identified as different between PIONEER I and PIONEER II are13:
- baseline weight
- baseline lesion count
These differences in baseline characteristics may in part account for the observed differences in magnitude between the 2 studies.
eControl=placebo.
fControl=placebo ± antibiotic.
gNumber of patients unless otherwise indicated EW.
hRace was self-reported.
iln PIONEER I, the “other” category included Asian (4 patients, 1.3%), American Indian or Alaskan native (2 patients, 0.7%), multiple races (1 patient, 0.3%), and other (4 patients,1.3%). In PIONEER II, the “other” category included Asian (10 patients, 3.1%), American Indian or Alaskan native (1 patient, 0.3%), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (1 patient, 0.3%), multiple races (3 patients, 0.9%), and other (9 patients, 2.8%).
jData reflect actual assessments, not the Hurley Stage stratification factor. A patient's overall Hurley Stage was documented as the highest stage across all affected anatomical regions. Stage I is defined as localized formation of single or multiple abscesses, without sinus tracts or scarring; Stage II as recurrent abscesses (single or multiple), with sinus tract formation and scarring; and Stage Ill as multiple abscesses, with extensive, interconnected sinus tracts and scarring.
kData missing for PIONEER II, HUMIRA EW (n=1).
lHigher values indicate a higher level of systemic inflammation.
US-HUMD-210070
PIONEER I and II STUDY DESIGNS—88 PATIENTS STUDIED IN OLE 1,3,13,15
88 patients who were studied in OLE received continuous HUMIRA weekly throughout the trial period (periods A and B) and throughout the OLE.
- Enrolled patients had a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of ≥3 with lesions in ≥2 anatomic areas, one of which was Hurley Stage II or III.
- Primary efficacy endpoint was Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at week 12.
- Period B explored the safety and efficacy of different maintenance regimens (continuous HUMIRA EW, reduction to HUMIRA EOW, or treatment withdrawal) over 24 weeks.
PIONEER I control=placebo PIONEER II control=placebo +/- antibiotic
aStratified by baseline Hurley Stage II vs III (PIONEER I & II) and baseline concomitant antibiotic use (PIONEER II).
160 mg week 0; 80 mg week 2; 40 mg from week 4.
bRe-randomization at entry to Period B, stratified by week 12 HiSCR status and baseline Hurley Stage II vs III.
c160 mg week 12; 80 mg week 14; 40 mg weekly from week 16.
dWeeks of efficacy and patient-reported outcomes analysis.
†Loss of response=defined as a loss of ≥50% in improvement in AN count achieved from baseline to week 12.
‡Worsening or absence of improvement=an AN count ≥ the baseline AN count at 2 consecutive visits (excluding week 12) occurring at least 14 days apart.
US-HUMD-210070
Safety data from randomized control and OLE periods in PIONEER I and II3,8,13,16
Adverse reaction rate observed in clinical trials and open-label extension (OLE) studies may not predict the rates observed in a broader HS patient population in clinical practice.
Malignancies: Lymphoma, including a rare type of T-cell lymphoma, and other malignancies, some fatal, have been reported in patients treated with TNF blockers, including HUMIRA.
Serious Infections: Patients treated with HUMIRA are at increased risk for developing serious infections that may lead to hospitalization or death. These infections include active tuberculosis (TB), reactivation of latent TB, invasive fungal infections, and bacterial, viral, and other infections due to opportunistic pathogens. Most patients who developed these infections were taking concomitant immunosuppressants such as methotrexate or corticosteroids.
Adverse reaction rate observed in clinical trials and OLE studies may not predict the rates observed in a broader HS patient population in clinical practice.
*Safety data for PIONEER I, Period B not shown as there is no comparable control group.
†Study design dosing: HUMIRA EW/HUMIRA EW.
‡Study design dosing: HUMIRA EW/HUMIRA EW/HUMIRA EW.
§Other than lymphoma, HSTCL, leukemia, NMSC or melanoma.
US-HUMD-210070
ADEPT Study Design1-4
EOW=every other week
a315 patients were initially randomized; however, 2 patients did not receive study drug.2
A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of HUMIRA in adult patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (≥3 swollen joints and ≥3 tender joints) who had an inadequate response to NSAIDs.2,4
Patients must have active psoriatic skin lesions or a documented history of psoriasis.2
Co-primary endpoints were American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at Week 12 and mean change from baseline in modified total Sharp score (mTSS) for HUMIRA-treated patients at Week 48 vs placebo patients at Week 24.1,2
After Week 12, patients who failed to have at least a 20% decrease in both swollen and tender joint counts on 2 consecutive visits could receive rescue therapy with corticosteroids or DMARDs.2
Select additional endpoints include ACR20 response rates at week 2, VAS pain scores at Week 2 and 24, and change from baseline in individual ACR components by visit.2
Select secondary endpoints include ACR20 at Week 24, ACR 50/70 at Weeks 12 and 24, HAQ-DI score at Weeks 12 and 24, and PASI 75 at Week 24.2
Patients who completed the original 24-week double-blind ADEPT study (n=289) were eligible for open-label treatment through Week 144, for which over 98% (n=285) elected to enroll.3,4
US-HUMD-200130
REVEAL STUDY DESIGN1,2,5
REVEAL was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 1212 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and ≥10% BSA involvement, PASI score ≥12, and PGA of at least moderate disease severity. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of psoriasis for at least 6 months and stable disease for at least 2 months before screening. Evaluations were performed over 3 treatment periods totaling 52 weeks. For the first 16 weeks (Period A), patients received either HUMIRA (n=814), at an initial dose of 80 mg SC at week 0 followed by 40 mg EOW SC starting at week 1, or placebo (n=398).
In Period B, patients who achieved at least a PASI 75 response at week 16 received open-label HUMIRA 40 mg EOW for 17 weeks. In Period C, patients who maintained at least a PASI 75 response at week 33 and were originally randomized to HUMIRA in Period A were re-randomized to receive HUMIRA 40 mg EOW or placebo for an additional 19 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoints at week 16 were proportion of patients achieving a PASI 75 response relative to baseline and proportion of patients achieving a PGA score of clear or minimal disease.
US-HUMD-190337
Fingernail Psoriasis Study Design1,2,9,13
A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study evaluated adult subjects with moderate to severe fingernail psoriasis who also had moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.1,2
BSA=body surface area; EOW=every other week; mNAPSI=modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index;
PGA-F=Physician’s Global Assessment of Fingernail Psoriasis; PGA-S=Physician’s Global Assessment of Skin Psoriasis.
Key inclusion criteria were adult subjects with2:
- Moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis with disease duration of at least 6 months and psoriasis in at least one fingernail
- Fingernail involvement ≥ moderate as measured by 5-point PGA-F scale
- mNAPSI score of target fingernail ≥8
- BSA ≥10%, or ≥5% BSA with a total mNAPSI score for all fingernails ≥20
Primary endpoint was proportion of subjects achieving PGA-F of 0 (clear) or 1 (minimal) and at least 2-grade improvement from baseline at Week 26.
Key secondary endpoint was proportion of subjects achieving ≥75% improvement from baseline in mNAPSI (mNAPSI 75) at Week 26.
US-HUMD-200257